Still, as the Vietnam War wore to a close in the early 1970s, the need for a new generation of equipment became more pressing. In many cases this was fortunate, as some of the early ancestors of the Big Five were rejected and restructured due to the lack of mature technologies. However, the Vietnam War distracted the attention of the Army and diverted funding from procurement into operations, slowing the pace of modernization. Most of the concepts behind the Big Five systems were born in the 1960s, under the understanding that the Army would need to replace the second generation of post–World War II equipment. 19FortyFive publishes original videos every day.) What if some or all of these programs had failed? Yet all of these systems came under criticism at the time, and each program needed to surmount obstacles on its way to serviceability. These systems, including the M1A1 Abrams main battle tank, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the Patriot air-defense system, the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter, and UH-60 Black Hawk utility helicopter, continue to provide the foundation of U.S. land forces, and reinvigorate conventional capabilities in the wake of the Vietnam War. ![]() The “Big Five” represented a collection of procurement programs designed to re-establish the technological supremacy of U.S. Army embarked on a series of procurement programs designed to revitalize the force, and to counter the overwhelming numerical advantage of the Warsaw Pact.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |